Is my right to breath and unalienable right?
I’m currently in graduate school and the most recent class I completed was all about evidence-based practice. What is evidence-based practice? It combines the needs of the patient/client, clinician expertise, and proven research on the efficacy of the technique you want to use in therapy. It is part of my code of ethics to make sure that what I am doing with a patient/client is not only responsible, but effective. I learned a lot in this class about finding research, reading research articles, and being able to interpret if the information in the article was a highly effective and responsible study giving accurate and statistically significant and clinically significant results or not. And the whole time during this class I was thinking, where is all the double blind, randomized controlled trials with a level 1 or level 2 hierarchy of efficacy surrounding the effectiveness of wearing masks to help prevent the spread of disease? And not the good masks, like gas masks that we know are effective, but thin t-shirt like cloth masks? Or even a clear face-shield type mask that just pushes what you exhale out and around the sides of it?
There isn’t any. Not a single study that says beyond a shadow of a doubt or at least with any kind of accuracy, that wearing masks and/or face shields will protect us or those around us from contracting the virus. Yet the government of our states and even other states and countries throughout the world have mandated wearing a mask in public – and even in some cases in your own home. How is it that the government can mandate cloth mask use when there is no evidence-based research that supports it, when if I did the same thing in my practice, I could be in violation of my code of ethics?
Even our own Dr. Faucci has retracted what he originally stated on national TV and has said that mask wearing and social distancing will not prevent the spread of COVID-19. What? Then why are we still wearing masks, social distancing, and closing businesses and schools, parks and medical institutions that perform medical procedures year round? Misinformation? Mass media fear-mongering?
I’m a pretty simple gal. And all it takes is a little thinking about the logistics and efficacy of all of this. First of all, when in a grocery store, how many people touch a produce item to look for blemishes and then put it down only to pick up a different one and then do the same thing? How many people pick up one can of olives only to realize it is the wrong one and put it back to pick up another one. Are we going to assume everyone washed their hands with soap and water before they came to the store? And then used hand sanitizer before and after they touched anything? Including the bagger and the cashier that slides our food choices toward the bagger? What about those that touch those itchy masks, and then touch something, including children who can’t tolerate wearing a mask and have the audacity to use their God-given right to breathe in that store? The same goes for grocery delivery services – someone is picking out your food for you, touching it, and delivering it. It only takes one person who wipes their itchy nose, smudging their mask down a bit, and then doesn’t use hand sanitizer, right? When you look at it that way, it seems like whatever could be airborne is just one piece of the puzzle – especially when there is no proof that wearing thin cotton or polyester masks are actually doing anything to prevent the spread of the virus. How small is the virus? How small are the holes between the mask fibers? I can tell you that I can see the holes between the cloth mask fibers, and I can’t see the virus, so I’m pretty sure my logic right there means that the virus is not being held back by a simple cloth mask. But that isn’t the point, is it?
But don’t forget about social distancing. Doesn’t that help with reducing the virus? If we can’t get close enough for them to breathe on us, then that will keep us safe, right? FIRST of all, if social distancing worked, why do we have to wear masks? And if masks worked, why would we have to social distance? And are we social distancing when we meet with our doctor in a confined space? Are we ignoring the fact that they have been in that same confined space with over 20 other individuals that day alone? Are we ignoring the fact that the flu kills people every year? Tuberculosis? Cancer? Why don’t we just wear ineffective masks year round to protect everyone that may have a weak immune system? Why don’t we close down small businesses so that large companies can take over the market and become monopolies? Why don’t we kick hard working Americans while they are down and only trying to provide for their families? Because we might protect them? Or because we are pretending that these ridiculous measures are actually helping anything?
I’m confused. People are being forced to wear masks to protect the health of everyone else? Since when has my personal safety and health been everyone else’s job? If everyone cared about my health so much, then why did I have to go for years without going to a doctor because I couldn’t afford outrageously priced health insurance AND life-saving and quality-of-life saving medication that my son and I needed for our medical conditions? Why didn’t anyone demand that the major pharmaceutical companies involved make a lower-priced generic product so that my health was protected? Where was the public rallying around me when one of my surgeries went wrong and the doctor that performed it was not held liable? Why did no one stand up for my health and well-being when I was in so much pain I couldn’t work or take care of my own family? Why is no one standing up for the mental health of all of the people who are dying by suicide in isolation because they lost their job and can’t socialize with others? Why weren’t they there? Because it wasn’t their job to be there. I am responsible for my own health and safety – we all are. Do we have a moral obligation to help if we can? Sure. But my moral obligation to someone else does not come at the expense of my own rights. That kind of defeats the purpose of the constitution. And the fact that the government is the one forcing us to do this is also suspect, isn’t it? And not only because they have forced ineffective methods on us.
So their argument is that if I choose to not wear a mask, I am selfish? When I wear a mask that reduces MY oxygen levels and ability to think properly, that is not proven to protect myself or others, why is that selfish? I can think of a whole lot of other things that sound “selfish” but we aren’t being forced to do them. Do you still think it is only about public health? Or could it be about compliance?
You’ve all heard of Pavlov and operant conditioning, right? People (and animals) can be trained into believing and reacting to something that isn’t even what they originally thought they were reacting to. All it takes is trained compliance. So why does the government want us to be compliant? That is a good question, and I hope each of you have asked yourself that. Why did Nazi Germany require all Jews to wear a red Star of David on their clothing? Why did they require good and law abiding citizens to report when Jews didn’t wear one? Because they were TOLD it was for the good of their state. And the general public believed it. Is it possible that we are falling for something similar? Citizens of Germany truly thought that they were protecting the health and well-being of their country, when instead they were essentially sentencing millions of Jews (and their fellow citizens – Jew or not) to death. It started with something small – like mandatory Star of David wearing on clothing. And slowly they built up those mandates until it was too late. After they train us to comply and wear a mask, isolate ourselves away from loved ones and others that may be free thinkers, force businesses to close and jobs to be lost, schools to close, will they force compliance on a vaccine that is nowhere near ready for mass production and deliverance? Again – evidence-based practice? It is not about COVID-19. Have you figured that out yet? The government is not looking out for everyone’s health right now, and if masks worked, they would provide us with heavy duty gas masks, right? Have you figured out that it is not about our health yet? If it were, they would be using sound science and research that everyone else has to live up to except them. I’m training to become a speech therapist, not a medical doctor, yet my code of ethics is higher than what they are mandating. And before you say that desperate times call for desperate measures, I’m not sure a virus that has a 97% recovery rate for the majority of individuals that contract it is desperate times. In fact, I’m not even sure that constitutes as a technical “pandemic,” at least not without calling the common cold, childhood cancer, autism and other medical diagnosis a pandemic as well. Seriously. Please tell me that you have considered all these things already.
But the numbers!! The numbers are going up, right? I’d say that is hard to say. Who is reporting the numbers? The mass media? Please refer to my previous posts for that. If a person has cancer and is already in the hospital dying of cancer and then gets COVID-19, did he die of cancer, or COVID-19? If a person with COVID-19 falls off of a 10 ft ladder and dies, did he die from the fall, or COVID-19? These are real cases!! Please look them up. If a person can get tested 4 times at different testing centers on the same day and two of those tests come back positive and two come back negative, which test result is correct? And are they counting both of those positive tests for the same person as one result? Or two? Or did we forget the evidence-based practice when creating coronavirus testing kits as well? OH, you mean the majority of rushed testing kits that test for any of 30+ strains of coronavirus that have been around forever and cause the common cold? You mean those tests can’t always decipher if it is regular coronavirus or COVID-19 that you are testing positive for? Is that why some who test positive have NO symptoms, and others have life-threatening complications? I’m just trying to ask the questions we should all be asking instead of just complying with something that has not been based on any kind of sound research or clinical evidence. And we are falling for it! Is there at least a little bit of doubt that something is not right in this situation? In a court of law we have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt… and as far as I’m concerned there are a lot of doubts stacking up here. Could there be a different agenda? Could there be a reason why compliance is the goal and not public health and safety? Of course. Have you learned anything from our history?
I’ve mentioned this in a previous post, but where is the pro-choice movement on this issue? As a woman especially, I have the right to choose what I do with my body, right? Even if it harms the health or even kills an unborn human baby. Right? It is my choice to decide what I do with my body and when. Then why do I not have the right to choose if I wear a mask or not? Especially if it has not been proven to increase the health of those around me? And who is fighting for all of those living unborn babies and their health and safety?
And if it is my responsibility to protect the health and safety of everyone else around me, then I choose to keep a firearm on me at all times. Why? Because you might need to be saved from certain death when someone tries to harm or kill you. That is my responsibility, right?
And why isn’t everyone taking in homeless people who have no protections against COVID-19? If everyone else’s health is the priority and the motive behind wearing masks, then why aren’t government officials requiring we wear masks taking homeless people into their own homes and providing them an opportunity to bathe and sanitize and stay out of the elements so they don’t contract COVID-19 or give it to anyone else?
And do you ever wonder if we would know that we are in a pandemic if the media hadn’t told us? Are people dropping dead around us left and right? Are 90% of its victims losing their battle? Or is there a 97% recovery rate?
I’m just saying that we need to look closer at the motives and the reason they want us to comply. We need to demand that science back up their claims, and NOT science from the companies that are profiting the most from COVID-19 (that is called BIAS). We need to understand that there is definitely reasonable doubt and according to our own justice system, their argument would not hold up in court.
So why are we still complying? Why are we telling on those that aren’t complying? Why are we acting like our freedoms aren’t in the balance, and our way of life has not already been threatened and taken over? We are doing this willingly. What next? Concentration camps for the vulnerable to “protect” them? When will we decide that enough is enough? Again, have we learned nothing from our history?
I haven’t been posting proof, because I feel that people are more likely to learn and understand if they do their own research and find out for themselves. But we are weary and I fear we are running out of time. But please, at least read the following segments of what make up the freedoms in our nation:
Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
Constitutional Amendment 14 section 1: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
So again I ask, is my right to breathe an unalienable right? What about my right to provide for my family? I think so, otherwise, what is the point?
Please don’t give up. Please don’t blindly follow. We are not sheeple, but rather individuals that have unalienable rights. If you have a lot of questions and want to learn more, please watch here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/bZ2yliCyu373/
